FOR
Fortune 500 Financial Client
When
July 2021
SKILLS
Auditing
Research
Testing
Prototyping
Strategy/ Analysis
Optimizing Debt Consolidation Through User-Centered Design
How might we improve a system for managing home loan debt online to better match user needs and expectations?
ROLE
In the summer of 2021, I was tasked with validating a Fortune 500 financial company’s debt consolidation and document submission feature.
Over the course of around eight weeks, I was the lead designer and worked with a UX Researcher to discover, evaluate, and measure a newly designed debt consolidation portal.
We reported to the client’s internal design team, and the VP in charge of the project.
The OBJECTIVE
Designing for Trust, Clarity, and Control
The assignment was to validate and improve a Fortune 500 financial company’s digital Debt Consolidation experience by identifying usability challenges and surfacing opportunities to build user trust, clarity, and autonomy—particularly around selecting and confirming accounts within the Home Equity Loan flow.
This involved:
Understanding how users interact with the current feature
Identifying friction points in selecting and confirming accounts/payoffs
Determining if users can confidently complete the process on their own
Exploring whether users prefer mobile or desktop
Recommending UX/UI changes based on research insights
The Process
Asking the Right Questions, The Right Way
After aligning on project goals, my research partner and I developed a test plan focused on areas where users might experience friction—
Then we …..
Designed test scenarios and flows for remote user interviews
I created interactive prototypes and supporting materials for usability testing
Went through 10 rounds of testing for 2 features across 2 devices.
Observed and documented friction points across platforms
Synthesized the research and Identified patterns around confusion, trust, and need for reassurance
Delivered a comprehensive readout with prioritized UX recommendations
Key Findings
Confirmations and Confusing Language
Users were unclear that accounts were pulled from credit reports, leading to mistrust
Many found the “Select Payoffs” step confusing due to vague labeling
Users wanted clearer, more recognizable account details
Mobile users had better step-by-step comprehension but struggled with screen space
Desktop users preferred the format but overlooked key context due to layout
IMPACT
Recommendations were adopted for redesigning key steps like “Select Payoffs” and account confirmation
Proposed contextual guidance (tooltips, helper text, live chat) to improve user confidence
Helped inform the next round of iterative design updates and testing
Reinforced the value of user-driven improvements in financial tools